Just off with my girl friend. You might have heard about them. They can be lots of fun!Metacrock wrote:I new that little cretinous piece of shit was coward. Moron preice verin hasn't the brains to be on this board. the cretin who knows he's a fool
Search found 13 matches
- Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:33 am
- Forum: Adventure of Faith (Religion/Spirituality)
- Topic: why does religion excite hatred?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 38161
Re: why does religion excite hatred?
- Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:05 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
- Replies: 14
- Views: 35009
Re: part 2
[quote="Metacrock" Meta:No, there's no basis for that. We don't have a part of the brain that lights up when we talk about UFOs. we don't have long term positive effects from seeing them.[/quote] So, what? The brain still perceives them. [/q No, if that was the case no one would ever claim there's a...
- Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:51 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
- Replies: 14
- Views: 35009
Re: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
try looking at my arguments. you choose not to recognize answers, they you can conceived yourself that you have never been answered. Stop playing games and try to reason. You can't even point to is because you failed to prove it. I countered that by quoting from the top researcher int he field who ...
- Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:35 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Argument 3 for Fool: TS argument
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13973
Re: Argument 3 for Fool: TS argument
that little cock sucking peice of shit knows he hasn't the brains to post on boards. little coward ran away No, I was off "in real life". Some of us are not brain dead failure phone jockeys who flunked out of school. I did not even agree to a third debate, though I will finish the other one right n...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:05 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
- Replies: 14
- Views: 35009
Re: part 2
Meta: To do that you would have to be in the brain while its working. Obviously we can't do that. So it's just as likely that this is the God made to communicate because we can't understand anything about the world otherwise What? I don't think it is just as likely. After all, one may make the same...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:13 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
- Replies: 14
- Views: 35009
Re: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
We already had this debate on CARM. I have no wish to have it again. http://www.christiandiscussionforums.org/v/showthread.php?t=134796 It came down to the fact that in order for this to prove that god exists nothing but god can be the cause of these experiences. (1) I never claimed to prove anythi...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:56 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Debate with fool 2: argument I Science = Social Construct
- Replies: 7
- Views: 22165
Re: Debate with fool 2: argument I Science = Social Construct
Kuhn's arguments are correct. I do not see a need to debate on with you on them because I have always admitted science does not do anything, and is itself a human creation based on several philosophical assumptions. I am afraid we don't have much to debate here. I think science itself is useful, be...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:43 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
- Replies: 14
- Views: 35009
Re: Meta vs Fool2: arguemnt 2 Co-determinate
We already had this debate on CARM. I have no wish to have it again. http://www.christiandiscussionforums.org/v/showthread.php?t=134796 It came down to the fact that in order for this to prove that god exists nothing but god can be the cause of these experiences. I and LACanuck both provided you wit...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:35 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Debate with fool 2: argument I Science = Social Construct
- Replies: 7
- Views: 22165
Re: Debate with fool 2: argument I Science = Social Construct
With that said Hume's arguments against a priori proofs is more than enough to show that things which work in physical reality are the only way to determine if a being exists in a way which makes logical sense to others than ourselves. (1) The only way to prove something a priori is if its opposite ...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:32 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: Debate with fool 2: argument I Science = Social Construct
- Replies: 7
- Views: 22165
Re: Debate with fool 2: argument I Science = Social Construct
Kuhn's arguments are correct. I do not see a need to debate on with you on them because I have always admitted science does not do anything, and is itself a human creation based on several philosophical assumptions. I am afraid we don't have much to debate here. I think science itself is useful, bec...