Search found 9 matches
- Sat May 09, 2009 12:33 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
"sorry if you think about the arguments I've made you would see that is very wong. I've proved it empirically. (1) I tell you there is a standard for measuring religious experinces, the "M" Scale. That is what tells what is and what is not a valid religious experince. Because it has been cross cult...
- Fri May 08, 2009 7:23 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
"I asked you not to answer anything until I got back and finished your previous post. O well no matter." I'm sorry about that. I thought you meant that you didn't want me addressing anything that you didn't cover in that post. My bad. "Why would one think there would be undeniable evidence? you are...
- Fri May 08, 2009 3:09 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
you did not show any facts that would lead to the conclusion that there is no God or religion in general is bad. All you show is that under circumstances some religious belief are wrong headed or lead to bad conclusions. That is not an indictment, and besides I have 350 studies that show you are wr...
- Fri May 08, 2009 12:25 am
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
"The proposition that religious belief is rationally warranted. That doesn't necessitate proving God exists, jut proving that it's rational to believe in God." I'd argue that it's not rational because of all the facts I showed earlier [including other things too of course]. "It's not a scientific s...
- Thu May 07, 2009 9:48 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
As for your first argument called "Argument from Epistemic Judgement" I think you're pretty much arguing the same thing that you did before. That since most people have these experiences that's proof that these experiences represent reality. Is that right? If I understand that argument I would just ...
- Thu May 07, 2009 9:32 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
It looks like we were posting at the same time. I'll get to your other arguments soon.
thank you
thank you
- Thu May 07, 2009 9:30 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
Hi Meta, I'm confused, if you don't want to debate the existence of God what are we going to debate? But I will respond to your claims and we can go from there. First to the two links you gave if I understand you right is that objective, scientific proof of God is not possible. It's something that y...
- Thu May 07, 2009 5:15 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
Re: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
Thank you for the welcome.
"I'll get cracking on it after dinner, latter tonight."
I'm looking forward to it
"I'll get cracking on it after dinner, latter tonight."
I'm looking forward to it
- Thu May 07, 2009 4:36 pm
- Forum: 1x1 Debates
- Topic: The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 45665
The Existence of God - Metacrock vs. XAtheistXX
I finally got my account working so we can debate here. I'll let Meta post his opening statement first and I'll reply and so on and people can vote on who won after the number of exchanges has been worked out. Sound like a plan?