TO OPEN

Discuss either theological doctrines, ideas about God, or Biblical criticism. I don't want any debates about creation vs evolution.

Moderator: Metacrock

Forum rules
(1) be interesting (2) be nice.
User avatar
Metacrock
Posts: 10046
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: meta's metaphor search. {g}

Post by Metacrock » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:22 am

JasonPratt wrote:
Metacrock wrote:God is so far above us we should try to think of God as the dialectic or something.
Even the other images you borrowed from the Bible are not abstractions like "dialectic", though.

Besides, isn't dialectic a description of interpersonal relationship? {s!}
NO I don't think so. It's a form of logic really. Not an interpersonal relationship becasue it applies to ideas not personalities.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts: 10046
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: TO OPEN

Post by Metacrock » Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:24 am

unred typo wrote:Are you ready for the po white, trailer trash, TV dinner version? Probably not… and it’s past my bed time… lucky you... ;)
O I'm from Texas, I'm sure I grew up with it.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

User avatar
unred typo
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:03 pm
Location: Undisclosed location in the eastern USA

Re: TO OPEN

Post by unred typo » Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:28 am

Actually, I only have a nice user friendly synopsis of the trinity, if you’re interested. I’m still working out the goose bumps though.
The truth will stand with you but man-made doctrines will melt away like cowards in the battle.

JasonPratt
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:48 am

Re: meta's metaphor search. {g}

Post by JasonPratt » Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:58 am

Metacrock wrote:
JasonPratt wrote:
Metacrock wrote:God is so far above us we should try to think of God as the dialectic or something.
Even the other images you borrowed from the Bible are not abstractions like "dialectic", though.

Besides, isn't dialectic a description of interpersonal relationship? {s!}
NO I don't think so. It's a form of logic really. Not an interpersonal relationship becasue it applies to ideas not personalities.
Not entirely sure how useful the analogy will be, then. ;)

Btw, remember how over on the Cadre backchannel I was griping about how even Christian theologians have a habit of treating God fundamentally as not being an interpersonal relationship? :mrgreen:

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts: 10046
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: TO OPEN

Post by Metacrock » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:07 am

unred typo wrote:Actually, I only have a nice user friendly synopsis of the trinity, if you’re interested. I’m still working out the goose bumps though.

sure, that's what the board is here for! :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts: 10046
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: meta's metaphor search. {g}

Post by Metacrock » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:09 am

JasonPratt wrote:
Btw, remember how over on the Cadre backchannel I was griping about how even Christian theologians have a habit of treating God fundamentally as not being an interpersonal relationship? :mrgreen:

It's a thorny problem. I feel that the parental love aspect of God is essential and really there. Yet I can't reduce God to the psychological dimensions of a human.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

User avatar
unred typo
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:03 pm
Location: Undisclosed location in the eastern USA

Re: meta's metaphor search. {g}

Post by unred typo » Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:57 pm

Metacrock wrote:
JasonPratt wrote:
Btw, remember how over on the Cadre backchannel I was griping about how even Christian theologians have a habit of treating God fundamentally as not being an interpersonal relationship? :mrgreen:

It's a thorny problem. I feel that the parental love aspect of God is essential and really there. Yet I can't reduce God to the psychological dimensions of a human.
Well, we were created in his image. Has to be some resemblance... or am I misunderstanding you?
The truth will stand with you but man-made doctrines will melt away like cowards in the battle.

User avatar
KR Wordgazer
Posts: 1410
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: TO OPEN

Post by KR Wordgazer » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:06 pm

I think its that though we were made in God's image, Unred, we have a tendency to think of God as being in our image. We put God in a box; we limit Him to our conceptions of Him.

We are like God in certain ways, but God is beyond us, beyond our full grasp and understanding. Still, I think it pleases God when we meet Him according to our best understanding of Him-- as a child to a Father (or Mother, as some of the biblical imagery shows). In fact, Christ made it clear that that's the best way to approach God: as a child. That's the stance that gives us enough humility to understand that we don't fully understand.

If we are not to think of God as a Person, it's because He's more than a person, not less than a person.
Wag more.
Bark less.

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts: 10046
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: meta's metaphor search. {g}

Post by Metacrock » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:18 pm

unred typo wrote:
Metacrock wrote:
JasonPratt wrote:
Btw, remember how over on the Cadre backchannel I was griping about how even Christian theologians have a habit of treating God fundamentally as not being an interpersonal relationship? :mrgreen:

It's a thorny problem. I feel that the parental love aspect of God is essential and really there. Yet I can't reduce God to the psychological dimensions of a human.
Well, we were created in his image. Has to be some resemblance... or am I misunderstanding you?

I don't know. If you think I'm saying we can't communicate with God then you are misreading me. God can communicate with us. I agree, we are made in god's image, and to me that means consciousness, so there has to be a fit someplace.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts: 10046
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: TO OPEN

Post by Metacrock » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:19 pm

KR Wordgazer wrote:I think its that though we were made in God's image, Unred, we have a tendency to think of God as being in our image. We put God in a box; we limit Him to our conceptions of Him.

We are like God in certain ways, but God is beyond us, beyond our full grasp and understanding. Still, I think it pleases God when we meet Him according to our best understanding of Him-- as a child to a Father (or Mother, as some of the biblical imagery shows). In fact, Christ made it clear that that's the best way to approach God: as a child. That's the stance that gives us enough humility to understand that we don't fully understand.

If we are not to think of God as a Person, it's because He's more than a person, not less than a person.

well said Kristen. yes, that's what I'm saying too. I think we tend to religate God to being just a big guy, a big powerful version of us. What I see in common is the notion of consciousness itself. Not to say God is limited to our limits.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

Post Reply