G.K. Chesterton writes wonderful books which are fun to read (and often controversial). Several things impress me about his polemical writing:
(1) He always calls his opponents by respectful names: "Mr. George Bernard Shaw," "Mr. Max Beerbohm," "Mr. Rudyard Kipling," etc.
(2) He always insists that he is right, unless he is writing some years later about his former opinions. He is always opinionated, but he always admits when he was wrong.
(3) He insists that no one should write something polemical unless it's the truth. Correctness is a duty and not a personal quirk of Mr. G.K. Chesterton.
(4) He says that declaring "I'm right" can be modest.
(5) His objections are nearly always deep. They come from reading and digesting an author's whole works. In other words, he does his homework.
(6) His objections are nearly always funny, even if they are to eugenics, socialism, capitalism, atheism, or whatever. Wit and humor abound.
(7) He always has a positive case to present--even if it stays unpresented backstage.
Controversy and how not to do it
Moderator:Metacrock
Forum rules
(1) be interesting (2) be nice.
(1) be interesting (2) be nice.
Re: Controversy and how not to do it
Gwarlroge wrote:G.K. Chesterton writes wonderful books which are fun to read (and often controversial). Several things impress me about his polemical writing:
(1) He always calls his opponents by respectful names: "Mr. George Bernard Shaw," "Mr. Max Beerbohm," "Mr. Rudyard Kipling," etc.
(2) He always insists that he is right, unless he is writing some years later about his former opinions. He is always opinionated, but he always admits when he was wrong.
(3) He insists that no one should write something polemical unless it's the truth. Correctness is a duty and not a personal quirk of Mr. G.K. Chesterton.
(4) He says that declaring "I'm right" can be modest.
(5) His objections are nearly always deep. They come from reading and digesting an author's whole works. In other words, he does his homework.
(6) His objections are nearly always funny, even if they are to eugenics, socialism, capitalism, atheism, or whatever. Wit and humor abound.
(7) He always has a positive case to present--even if it stays unpresented backstage.
he's a role model. I wish I could do it like he did. He also didn't have to post on CARM./ I wonder if he was made to feel as the atheists made me feel?
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Controversy and how not to do it
test
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Controversy and how not to do it
I'm afraid he wss more like me Metacrock. We were both Cynical Englishmen, so more likely he'd have felt Quiet bothered. if they really got to him his mood may have reached very cross.
But I doubt he'd have felt inferior. Sort of hard to with the whole Stiff Upper Lip, Imperial Glory attitude.
As a Texan you'd feel infuriated and likely to shoot them.
But I doubt he'd have felt inferior. Sort of hard to with the whole Stiff Upper Lip, Imperial Glory attitude.
As a Texan you'd feel infuriated and likely to shoot them.
Re: Controversy and how not to do it
ZAROVE wrote:I'm afraid he wss more like me Metacrock. We were both Cynical Englishmen, so more likely he'd have felt Quiet bothered. if they really got to him his mood may have reached very cross.
But I doubt he'd have felt inferior. Sort of hard to with the whole Stiff Upper Lip, Imperial Glory attitude.
As a Texan you'd feel infuriated and likely to shoot them.
well yea, I feel that way on a good day.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief