In his alter ego on CARM Fleet said:
It seems to be the case that theists have very particular associations with the word "truth". They appear to be using it as though certain propositions were sealed with a special seal by God himself that certifies their soundness. I call this capital T Truth. This is the eternal Truth of Platonism.
Atheists, on the other hand, have a more humble and pragmatic conception of truth - statements about the world are deemed true if they appear to be true to the best of our ability to tell the difference. I call this small t truth. This is the truth of science, where any theory can be overturned by fresh observations.
An extremely common "chess move" in theist-atheist discussions is when the theist sets up a false dichotomy by conflating Truth and truth. He will tell the atheist that any of the atheist's positive statements about the world either presuppose God (by invoking Truth) or else must be utterly flawed and worthless. This doesn't take into account the humbler pragmatic notion of small t truth.
Thoughts?