Being and Nonbeing
Moderator:Metacrock
Either there just is and always has been being in some manner, or else being can come from nonbeing.
Do we all agree on this, or are there third, fourth and fifth options I've overlooked?
Do we all agree on this, or are there third, fourth and fifth options I've overlooked?
Re: Being and Nonbeing
No. Being cannot come from non being, Some form of being must exist eternal. Ground of being is necessary.Magritte wrote:Either there just is and always has been being in some manner, or else being can come from nonbeing.
Do we all agree on this, or are there third, fourth and fifth options I've overlooked?
"Being has to be" Ray Hinman (my twin)
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Being and Nonbeing
I think your problem here is, as I said on another thread, that infinities (as best people can tell) are things of a totally different and non-reciprocal order.
How much is assuming "ground of Being" can be described as "being" too, thereby implying there is some Godlike part in us that can leap 'beyond finitude' without ambiguity or doubt (as Meillasoux also attempts) is ... itself a non-controversial assumption? Can the finite pattern-matching machinery of the human mind really see beyond the finite? Beyond the countable?
How much is assuming "ground of Being" can be described as "being" too, thereby implying there is some Godlike part in us that can leap 'beyond finitude' without ambiguity or doubt (as Meillasoux also attempts) is ... itself a non-controversial assumption? Can the finite pattern-matching machinery of the human mind really see beyond the finite? Beyond the countable?
The “One” is the space of the “world” of the tick, but also the “pinch” of the lobster, or that rendezvous in person to confirm online pictures (with a new lover or an old God). This is the machinery operative...as “onto-theology."
Dr Ward Blanton
Dr Ward Blanton
Re: Being and Nonbeing
God may be neither being nor non-being but transcend these categories. In what sense does being partake of 'isness'? Being can't be another existent, another thing that is (?) because if it were, we could talk about the being of being and so forth ad infinitum.Magritte wrote:Either there just is and always has been being in some manner, or else being can come from nonbeing.
Do we all agree on this, or are there third, fourth and fifth options I've overlooked?
Re: Being and Nonbeing
Yes, Jim has nicely avoided the dreaded onto-theological error....
The “One” is the space of the “world” of the tick, but also the “pinch” of the lobster, or that rendezvous in person to confirm online pictures (with a new lover or an old God). This is the machinery operative...as “onto-theology."
Dr Ward Blanton
Dr Ward Blanton
Re: Being and Nonbeing
Jim, as I see it being is already transcendent. Not only does it transcend the particular - bread boxes, people, planets, galaxies, possible worlds - it also transcends ways or orders of being. Physical being, abstract being, "spiritual" being if you go in for that stuff.
I think we're on the same page that being isn't another existent.
I think we're on the same page that being isn't another existent.
Re: Being and Nonbeing
explain--simplymet wrote:I think your problem here is, as I said on another thread, that infinities (as best people can tell) are things of a totally different and non-reciprocal order.
That an aspect of being is eternal and necessary doesn't mean all aspects are. McQuarrrie distinguishes between Being and the beings. Individual beings are not being itself,How much is assuming "ground of Being" can be described as "being" too, thereby implying there is some Godlike part in us that can leap 'beyond finitude' without ambiguity or doubt (as Meillasoux also attempts) is ... itself a non-controversial assumption? Can the finite pattern-matching machinery of the human mind really see beyond the finite? Beyond the countable?
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Being and Nonbeing
explain--simplymet wrote:I think your problem here is, as I said on another thread, that infinities (as best people can tell) are things of a totally different and non-reciprocal order.
That an aspect of being is eternal and necessary doesn't mean all aspects are. McQuarrrie distinguishes between Being and the beings. Individual beings are not being itself,How much is assuming "ground of Being" can be described as "being" too, thereby implying there is some Godlike part in us that can leap 'beyond finitude' without ambiguity or doubt (as Meillasoux also attempts) is ... itself a non-controversial assumption? Can the finite pattern-matching machinery of the human mind really see beyond the finite? Beyond the countable?
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Being and Nonbeing
I did not say it was. Niether does Tillich, It's not one of the beings, that's why Tillich says God does not exist,Magritte wrote:Jim, as I see it being is already transcendent. Not only does it transcend the particular - bread boxes, people, planets, galaxies, possible worlds - it also transcends ways or orders of being. Physical being, abstract being, "spiritual" being if you go in for that stuff.
I think we're on the same page that being isn't another existent.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Being and Nonbeing
You wrote that being exists:Metacrock wrote:I did not say it was. Niether does Tillich, It's not one of the beings, that's why Tillich says God does not exist,Magritte wrote:Jim, as I see it being is already transcendent. Not only does it transcend the particular - bread boxes, people, planets, galaxies, possible worlds - it also transcends ways or orders of being. Physical being, abstract being, "spiritual" being if you go in for that stuff.
I think we're on the same page that being isn't another existent.
What gives? Did you mean beings?No. Being cannot come from non being, Some form of being must exist eternal. Ground of being is necessary.