Search found 351 matches
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:00 pm
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: Expert vs. Expert....
- Replies: 47
- Views: 69077
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
Turns out if you read the rest of the article , the engineers kinda DO have an answer to the question - 42,000 gallons of fuel - but the question they're asking is exactly, precisely, forensically, obsessive compulsive anally what happened, because: Engineers said that here and across the country, ...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:46 pm
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: Expert vs. Expert....
- Replies: 47
- Views: 69077
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
I checked another Griffin reference, because lies usually travel in packs Check this out - Griffin writes: New York Times writer James Glanz, who himself has a Ph.D. in physics, wrote: “[E]xperts said no building like it, a modern, steel-reinforced high-rise, had ever collapsed because of an uncont...
- Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:34 pm
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: Expert vs. Expert....
- Replies: 47
- Views: 69077
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
I don't know why you think any of this makes it OK that Griffin deliberately misrepresented the intent of the source he was quoting . Not quite. In the article, Biederman shits out an ad hoc hypothesis. That's to be expected. In the end, however, Sisson admits "they have no idea" what the answer is...
- Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:45 pm
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: WTC Not a Demolition
- Replies: 22
- Views: 35513
Re: WTC Not a Demolition
So to sum up, your contention is that nano-thermite was installed in the WTC buildings in the form of ceiling tiles and smoke detectors by unwitting stooges who nonetheless wired these objects for remote demolition, My contention is that it would be possible to conceal nano-thermite in materials th...
- Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:33 pm
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: Expert vs. Expert....
- Replies: 47
- Views: 69077
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
Griffin writes: ‘The important questions,” says [one of the professors], ‘are how much sulfur do you need, and where did it come from?’”15 And from the article he's quote mining : "The important questions," says Biederman, "are how much sulfur do you need, and where did it come from? The answer cou...
- Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:54 pm
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: WTC Not a Demolition
- Replies: 22
- Views: 35513
Re: WTC Not a Demolition
Right, so any evidence supporting jet planes and fires causing the collapse is actually evidence of the ingenious conspiracy to make you think that jet planes and fires caused the collapse. The point is, there wasn't 'evidence' supporting jet planes and/or fires casuing collapse; only a false impli...
- Sun Jan 22, 2012 7:49 am
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: WTC Not a Demolition
- Replies: 22
- Views: 35513
Re: WTC Not a Demolition
One argument for the demolition hypothesis is that eyewitness testimony and video evidence show high velocity ejection of debris (suggestive of demolition squibs) coming out of floors before they collapsed. Some of these ejections occurred as much as twenty to thirty floors beneath the collapse fron...
- Sun Jan 22, 2012 6:10 am
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: WTC Not a Demolition
- Replies: 22
- Views: 35513
Re: WTC Not a Demolition
a film http://www.911myths.com/index.php/WTC_Not_A_Demolition Watch the first five or ten minutes. Watch 5 or 10 minutes....just enough to realize that Not a Demolition is an epic failure .... A film created by a die-hard apologist of the official narrative for those with unabashed contempt for the...
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:14 am
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: Expert vs. Expert....
- Replies: 47
- Views: 69077
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
And your use of the term "unscientific" above is frivolous and manipulative. If you want to discuss bias you can start there. :shock: Fleet, are you kidding??? You want to discuss my bias, while you pathetically paint the Truth Movement as an extremist/fringe group like the John Birchers. Unbelieva...
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:12 am
- Forum: City of God in Secular City
- Topic: Expert vs. Expert....
- Replies: 47
- Views: 69077
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
Gee Urbild, I'm surprised at the the number of times defenders of the conspiracist narrative are willing to spin contradictory and unscientific theories in order to avoid a conclusion that is politically unfavorable. :shock: You have to be kidding me. Its not the same thing. The fact of the matter ...