Eight Levels of Verification for the Gospels

Discuss either theological doctrines, ideas about God, or Biblical criticism. I don't want any debates about creation vs evolution.

Moderator:Metacrock

Forum rules
(1) be interesting (2) be nice.
User avatar
Metacrock
Posts:10046
Joined:Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location:Dallas
Contact:
Re: Eight Levels of Verification for the Gospels

Post by Metacrock » Sat Oct 14, 2017 3:51 am

The web sites I linked to indicate otherwise.

What evidence do you have that the consensus is that the Empty tomb was part of the PMPN?
no they do not, Kirby himself says it's consensus and you quoted that source yourself.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

The Pixie
Posts:852
Joined:Thu Apr 28, 2016 12:54 pm

Re: Eight Levels of Verification for the Gospels

Post by The Pixie » Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:55 am

Metacrock wrote:
The web sites I linked to indicate otherwise.

What evidence do you have that the consensus is that the Empty tomb was part of the PMPN?
no they do not, Kirby himself says it's consensus and you quoted that source yourself.
Did you read the sources? This one ends at 15:47, with the implication that none of the 87 scholars believed the passion nasrrative continued after that:
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/p ... young.html

This one finishes on 15:37, with Jesus dying.
https://sites.google.com/site/briansgre ... -narrative

So again, what evidence do you have that the consensus is that the Empty tomb was part of the PMPN?

Post Reply