Expert vs. Expert....
Moderator:Metacrock
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
=More good stuff:
http://themester.indiana.edu/events/harrit.shtml
http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/4 ... them-.html
http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/4 ... edent.html
http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/4 ... tion-.html
http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20111103044226974
http://www.amazon.com/review/R2684DVPF7 ... 1566568684
http://themester.indiana.edu/events/harrit.shtml
http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/4 ... them-.html
http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/4 ... edent.html
http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/4 ... tion-.html
http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20111103044226974
http://www.amazon.com/review/R2684DVPF7 ... 1566568684
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
"before we are told what to think by the experts." So let my experts tell you what to think.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
- fleetmouse
- Posts:1814
- Joined:Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:57 am
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
Here's what I see as the argument in the OP video: we're not sure exactly how those buildings collapsed, and there are different opinions on the forensic technical details of the matter, therefore there must have been a conspiracy within the US government and media and etc. etc. except "they" can't get their details straight. Wouldn't it look more like a conspiracy if there were only one interpretation of forensic technical details and all government agencies and media outlets promoted solely that?
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
Maybe the buildings were known to have weaknesses, so they were just rigged covertly to be blown down, demolished, should he need for that ever arise. Thus, avoiding the worst consequences of 'asymmetrical collapse?"
... And then, on that day, they blew them.
... And then, on that day, they blew them.
The “One” is the space of the “world” of the tick, but also the “pinch” of the lobster, or that rendezvous in person to confirm online pictures (with a new lover or an old God). This is the machinery operative...as “onto-theology."
Dr Ward Blanton
Dr Ward Blanton
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
they could have been substandard anyway. I have another really intelligent friend besides Urbie who also believes the same thing. I'm not poo poing. I want more proof.met wrote:Maybe the buildings were known to have weaknesses, so they were just rigged covertly to be blown down, demolished, should he need for that ever arise. Thus, avoiding the worst consequences of 'asymmetrical collapse?"
... And then, on that day, they blew them.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
Meta, ditto on the first part .... I, too, know some very smart people who are convinced as Urbie is about it.
The “One” is the space of the “world” of the tick, but also the “pinch” of the lobster, or that rendezvous in person to confirm online pictures (with a new lover or an old God). This is the machinery operative...as “onto-theology."
Dr Ward Blanton
Dr Ward Blanton
- fleetmouse
- Posts:1814
- Joined:Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:57 am
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
Why did the intelligence of the truthers come into it?
Strictly speaking, they could all be complete idiots and still be right. And they could all be geniuses and be wrong.
Strictly speaking, they could all be complete idiots and still be right. And they could all be geniuses and be wrong.
Re: Expert vs. Expert....
What does that mean?Metacrock wrote:"before we are told what to think by the experts." So let my experts tell you what to think.